Trust chair Keith Morgan, an accountant and football finance expert, gives his analysis of the latest audited accounts for the year ended May 31, 2017 submitted by Cardiff City Football Club (Holdings) Limited.
The following is my commentary on the recently filed audited accounts, which were signed off as approved by the board of directors onFebruary 21, 2018.
- There was a net loss for the year of £21.1m, which is up substantially from the loss of £8.7m in the previous year.
- As a result of the above losses , despite a new share capital injection of £8m created by a conversion of debt into shares by the owner, the net deficit on the balance sheet increased by £13.1m to £80.9m.
- The club remains critically dependent upon its owner Tan Sri Vincent Tan, who is by far its largest creditor, for its ongoing financial viability.
- The club are confident that, because of all the work to date that has been done to date on the club`s finances, it will be compliant with the Profitability and Sustainability (previously Financial Fair Play) requirements for the period covered by the accounts under review.
Main reasons for increased losses
These can be summarised as follows £m
Decrease in revenue (4.4)
Decrease in wages 4.5
Decrease in exceptional income (8.3)
Increase in finance costs (6.1)
Increase in profit on player sales 3.0
Decrease in administration expenses 3.9
Increase in other costs of sales (4.1)
Other reasons (0.9)
This fell in the year by £4.4m, primarily as a result of lower income from centralised broadcasting and commercial distributions (which include “parachute payments”) which fell by £4.3m. Gate receipts and match day income also fell by £0.6m, while sponsorship and other commercial income rose by £0.5m.
The club`s policy of making efforts to reduce its wage bill continued during the year, leading to the substantial fall summarised above. Players` wages and salaries at £20.6m fell to 71.6% of total income compared to the figure of £25.4m in 2015-16 which represented 76.6% of total income.
Lack of exceptional income
In the year to May 31, 2016 the club benefited from a debt write-off of £10m by its owner Tan Sri Vincent Tan. It also benefited from a one-off business rates rebate of £0.4m. Neither of these benefits were repeated in the year to May 31, 2017.
In 2015-16 the club had a cost of £2.2m arising from the termination of certain employee contracts. This cost was not repeated in 2016-17.
The net effect of the above exceptional items not occurring in season 2016-17 was to increase losses by the £8.2m referred to in the above summary.
Increase in finance costs
There are three main elements of this increase in the year
- The loan discounting charge on the long term loans provided by the owner increased from £1.2m to £5.8m as a result of a technical accounting treatment required by accounting standards rather than a “trading” cost.
- Interest payable on loans provided to the club by Tormen Finance Inc. , in which the club`s Chairman Mehmet Dalman has a significant interest, went up by £1.0m. This was due to the fact that Tormen made further loans of £6m to the club in the year taking the amount owed to it up to £11m as at May 31, 2017. Interest on these loans was charged at a rate of 8% p.a. and the loans were secured over assets of the football group companies.
- Other interest payable increased by £0.5m
It should be noted that no interest was paid on the debt due to the club`s owner in the year, all interest accruing (at a stated rate of 7% p.a. on part of the debt) being waived by him and therefore becoming non-payable. This resulted in a saving to the club of approximately £2m in interest charges for the year ended May 31, 2017.
Increase in profit on sale of players
In season 2016-17 the club made a profit of £5.5m from the sale of players (comparing realised sales values with the players` net book value at the date of disposal) compared to a smaller profit of £2.5m in the previous season.
Decrease in administrative costs
This is principally as a result of a reduction of £3.0m in an item “impairment of intangible assets”.
A player`s cost to the club is written off over the length of the contract given to him. So a £3m signing on a three year contract is shown as a cost of £1m in the first year after he is signed, reducing his value in the books to £2m after a year. Every year the club is obliged to compare the total written down cost of the whole squad against their likely real value (sometimes a sale after the season end establishes that value with certainty). At the end of season 2015/16 the club considered the true value to be £3.8m less than the written down value in the books, so made a further charge of that amount in the audited accounts. At the end of season 2016-17 the comparative further write down considered necessary was only £0.8m , so an improvement of £3.0m in this annual cost.
Increase in other costs of sales
Having discussed the matter with the club (as the breakdown is not available in published accounts), the increase in other costs of sale (i.e. excluding player wage costs) results from increased spending on loan players and agents fees, plus some costs associated with early termination of player contracts and some amendments to non-playing staff contracts. The loan costs and some agents fees are instead of expenditure on permanent player contracts, and the contract termination costs will reduce future wages costs for the players involved.
I have no knowledge of who benefitted from improved contracts but, as a fan, if it relates to retaining the management team who have done so well to improve the team on the pitch , then my opinion is that it is money well spent.
The balance sheet
As stated in the key findings near the start of this report, the club had net liabilities of £80.8m as at May 31, 2017. This comprised of £71.2m of assets and £151.9m of liabilities. The various main assets and liabilities are commented on below.
The total recorded value of the playing squad as at May 31, 2017 was £3.4m. A note to the accounts records the fact that the contracts relating to those players over which that value would be written off was of an average 16 months duration. The club added £5.9m of player registrations and released players with an original cost of £9.1m in the year. In season 2015/16 it had added £2.4m of players and released players of cost £2.0m.
The stadium and its contents
This had a value of £51.8m, down from £54.8m in the previous year due to a normal depreciation charge.
The club had £9.3m of cash at the balance sheet date.
It had £6.4m due to it, including £1.3m due in respect of football receivables (balance of transfer fees etc.).
Stocks (club shop etc.) were just under £0.2m.
These were liabilities as at May 31, 2017 payable by May 31, 2018. They totalled £36.1m, of which £11m was due to Tormen Finance (see above) and £8.8m was normal business cost accruals and deferred income (season ticket money for season 2017/18 already received in 2016-17).
Other borrowings of £11.2m represent 3rd party funding (identities unknown) received against the guaranteed future income stream from broadcast revenues (parachute payments).
These fall due for payment sometime after May 31, 2018 i.e. more than 12 months after the balance sheet date.
By far the biggest debt due in this category is a debt of £115.1m (of a total of £115.8m) mainly due to the club`s owner Tan Sri Vincent Tan. This amount is £14.3m higher than a year earlier, despite £8m of the earlier debt having been converted into shares during the year indicating that substantial further loans were made by the owner to the club during the 2016/17 season.
Of the above total of £115.1m, £80.5m is non-interest bearing and does not carry an option to convert into shares. The remaining £34.6m is interest bearing at 7% p.a. (but the owner waived his right to interest for the full year) and carries the right to convert into shares at the owner`s option.
After the year end, in June 2017, the owner converted a further £12.7m of debt due to him into shares to improve the balance sheet position.
Summary and conclusions
- The club made a net loss of £21.1m in season 2016-17, up £12.4m compared to the loss of £8.7m in the previous season. This was largely as a result of a lack of the benefit of a £10m debt write-off which happened in 2015-16 but was not repeated in 2016-17, coupled with some technical accounting adjustments needed to be made to comply with Accounting Standards (the cost of which was up £4.6m compared to the previous year).
- The club are confident, after adjusting for the above technical accounting matter and other costs allowed for under the Profitability and Sustainability regulations, that it will remain compliant with those regulations for the period covered by these reviewed accounts.
- The work required to maintain the club`s financial viability remains great , with even more work being required going into season 2018-19 when the club will no longer be in receipt of its parachute payments. This income will need to be replaced by alternative income streams, by further cost reductions or probably by a combination of both.